000 | 03846nam a22005055i 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 978-3-319-65554-3 | ||
003 | DE-He213 | ||
005 | 20190313085146.0 | ||
007 | cr nn 008mamaa | ||
008 | 170914s2017 gw | s |||| 0|eng d | ||
020 |
_a9783319655543 _9978-3-319-65554-3 |
||
024 | 7 |
_a10.1007/978-3-319-65554-3 _2doi |
|
050 | 4 | _aBJ1-1725 | |
072 | 7 |
_aHPQ _2bicssc |
|
072 | 7 |
_aPHI005000 _2bisacsh |
|
082 | 0 | 4 |
_a170 _223 |
100 | 1 |
_aZwart, Hub. _eauthor. |
|
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aTales of Research Misconduct _h[electronic resource] : _bA Lacanian Diagnostics of Integrity Challenges in Science Novels / _cby Hub Zwart. |
264 | 1 |
_aCham : _bSpringer International Publishing : _bImprint: Springer, _c2017. |
|
300 |
_aIX, 263 p. 84 illus., 5 illus. in color. _bonline resource. |
||
336 |
_atext _btxt _2rdacontent |
||
337 |
_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia |
||
338 |
_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier |
||
347 |
_atext file _bPDF _2rda |
||
490 | 1 |
_aLibrary of Ethics and Applied Philosophy, _x1387-6678 ; _v36 |
|
505 | 0 | _aChapter1. Introduction -- Chapter2. Conceptual framework and methodology: Lacanian psychoanalysis -- Chapter3. Phage ethics (Sinclair Lewis – Arrowsmith, 1925) -- Chapter4. The toxic picture (C.P. Snow – The Affair, 1960) -- Chapter 5. Crisis and credibility (Carl Djerassi – Cantor’s Dilemma, 1989) -- Chapter 6. Tainted texts (Pascal Mercier – Perlmann’s Silence, 1995) -- Chapter 7. The retraction (Allegra Goodman – Intuition, 2006) -- Plagiarising nature (Ian McEwan – Solar, 2010) -- Chapter 9. Conclusion: psychoanalysing science. . | |
506 | 0 | _aOpen Access | |
520 | _aThis monograph contributes to the scientific misconduct debate from an oblique perspective, by analysing seven novels devoted to this issue, namely: Arrowsmith by Sinclair Lewis (1925), The affair by C.P. Snow (1960), Cantor’s Dilemma by Carl Djerassi (1989), Perlmann’s Silence by Pascal Mercier (1995), Intuition by Allegra Goodman (2006), Solar by Ian McEwan (2010) and Derailment by Diederik Stapel (2012). Scientific misconduct, i.e. fabrication, falsification, plagiarism, but also other questionable research practices, have become a focus of concern for academic communities worldwide, but also for managers, funders and publishers of research. The aforementioned novels offer intriguing windows into integrity challenges emerging in contemporary research practices. They are analysed from a continental philosophical perspective, providing a stage where various voices, positions and modes of discourse are mutually exposed to one another, so that they critically address and question one another. They force us to start from the admission that we do not really know what misconduct is. Subsequently, by providing case histories of misconduct, they address integrity challenges not only in terms of individual deviance but also in terms of systemic crisis, due to current transformations in the ways in which knowledge is produced. Rather than functioning as moral vignettes, the author argues that misconduct novels challenge us to reconsider some of the basic conceptual building blocks of integrity discourse. | ||
650 | 0 | _aPhilosophy. | |
650 | 0 |
_aLiterature, Modern _x20th century. |
|
650 | 0 | _aEthics. | |
650 | 0 | _aPsychoanalysis. | |
650 | 1 | 4 | _aPhilosophy. |
650 | 2 | 4 | _aEthics. |
650 | 2 | 4 | _aPsychoanalysis. |
650 | 2 | 4 | _aTwentieth-Century Literature. |
650 | 2 | 4 | _aScience, Humanities and Social Sciences, multidisciplinary. |
710 | 2 | _aSpringerLink (Online service) | |
773 | 0 | _tSpringer eBooks | |
776 | 0 | 8 |
_iPrinted edition: _z9783319655536 |
830 | 0 |
_aLibrary of Ethics and Applied Philosophy, _x1387-6678 ; _v36 |
|
856 | 4 | 0 | _uhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65554-3 |
912 | _aZDB-2-REP | ||
999 |
_c48539 _d48539 |